HRRecruitingAlert.com » The second interview: It’s a whole different ballgame

The second interview: It’s a whole different ballgame

April 7, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: Assessing the right candidate, Interviewing, Latest News & Views

A common recruiting mistake is treating a candidate’s second interview as just a rehash of the first round, only this time, with a higher-level manager involved. But here’s how you can craft the interview to really make sure you’ve got a good employee in the pipeline.

First, you have to decide on the purpose of the second (or third) interview – Is it just to get a final seal of approval for a candidate you and the manager have decided to hire, or is this the “real” interview, with the first round acting more as an initial screen?

If the purpose is verification, it’s important to only invite one candidate for this round (or two if two jobs are open, etc.). Include the people the candidate will be working with, if you want their input, and set an informal tone – if this is really for final verification interview, the grilling should have already taken place.

For all the marbles

But if it’s still up in the air among multiple candidates, here are some ways to get the most out of the second round of interviews:

  • Make sure the decision-maker is ready. The hiring manager should go into the interview planning to make a decision soon afterward.
  • Give candidates feedback on the first interview. When you schedule the interviews, tell people beforehand what they might be able to improve on to help their chances. Also, have the hiring manager prepare questions based on what was discovered in the first round.
  • Let candidates know the schedule and process. If this is the last step, let people know. Likewise, make sure they know they’re part of a select few, if that’s the case. They’ve likely been taking time off from another job to come interview, and it’s nice to know when they might expect a payoff.

Click here to learn five more expert tips for conducting the second interview.

  • Share/Bookmark

One Response to “The second interview: It’s a whole different ballgame”

  1. mike Says:

    I agree with the two of the three bullets concerning the 2nd interview. The middle bullet I have some concerns about. The purpose of the interview is to root out fact from fiction concerning an candidate’s past performance and to get an idea how they would perrform in your working environment. It isn’t how well they meet the interviewer’s expectations on hiring protocol or other non-job related item.

    It seems that giving a candidate feedback about their performance in the first interview is a risky venture. If there are any problems with getting hired, the candidate may have ammo to suggest bias based on the quality or quantity of feedback they were given and whether they were given serious consideration. Does every candidate get the same quality or quantity of feedback? If there is a candidate that you have a bias towards, you may give better feedback. If there is a candidate you have a bias against, the feedback may be of less quality.

    Giving them feedback so that they perform better in the next interview seems to be counterproductive. It may give you insight into how they apply feedback and take direction, but would be fairly useless beyond that. It is probably a given that the interested candidate will adjust their presentation to the feedback you have provided. When they don’t get hired, is it because they were not the best qualified candidate or you gave lousy feedback. I wouldn’t want a court to decide the answer for me.
























advertisement

Recent Popular Articles

Whitepapers




advertisement