<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRRecruitingAlert.com &#187; reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/tag/reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com</link>
	<description>Headlines and advice for the practicing recruiter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2 big risks of not having a reference policy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/the-risks-of-not-having-a-reference-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/the-risks-of-not-having-a-reference-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[References]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of debate about what companies should say when they&#8217;re asked about former employees. Here&#8217;s one big rule to keep in mind: Have a policy and stick to it. There are a few legal risks companies face when giving out references. A big one, of course, is discrimination. If most employees just get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of debate about what companies should say when they&#8217;re asked about former employees. Here&#8217;s one big rule to keep in mind: <span id="more-274"></span></p>
<p>Have a policy and stick to it.</p>
<p>There are a few legal risks companies face when giving out references.</p>
<p>A big one, of course, is discrimination. If most employees just get a neutral reference confirming titles and dates, but one manager strays from the norm to bash an ex-employee, there&#8217;s a chance he or she could say it was based on race, gender, religion, etc.</p>
<p>Same goes if a manager refuses to give a reference to one former worker because of membership in a protected class. Consistency is the key.</p>
<p><strong>Negligent references</strong></p>
<p>Another pitfall for employers to watch is the &#8220;negligent reference&#8221; &#8212; when a company fails to warn the new employer about a threat posed by the worker.</p>
<p>In one <a href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/false-references-can-get-you-sued/" target="_blank">recent case</a>, an ex-employee got a glowing reference despite being fired for conduct that put people&#8217;s lives in danger. The company was sued and lost.</p>
<p>According to the court, if the company had given no reference at all it would&#8217;ve been fine. But when the manager offered some information, he had a duty to tell the whole story.</p>
<p>How does your company handle reference requests? Let us know by leaving a comment below.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=274&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/the-risks-of-not-having-a-reference-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

