‘Test driving’ candidates: Pros and cons
June 30, 2008 by Sam NarisiPosted in: Assessing the right candidate, In This Week's E-Newsletter, Interviewing, Latest News & Views
A growing interview trend: giving candidates real work to prove they’re right for the job. Will it help companies find the best talent?
The basic idea is to have the person do part of the position’s duties, either by letting them try for a short time after the interview or paying them to work for a day or two. Interviews often include a test or simulation, but some experts say employers should have candidates do real work before they’re hired.
Here’s why:
- It makes candidates back up the claims they made in the interview.
- It helps candidates make sure they actually want the job.
- You can see how the candidates interact with potential bosses, subordinates and co-workers.
But the method isn’t perfect. The downsides:
- It won’t work for every job. Some positions require on-the-job training or an understanding of the company they can only get after they’ve been hired.
- In many cases, you’d have to ask employees to take a full day or more off from their current jobs.
- It costs money.
- Just like some poor performers get hired because they know how to interview, some people might be impressive during the trial, then flop once they’re hired.
Have you ever tried something like this for assessing candidates? Did it work? Drop us a comment. We’d like to hear what you think.
Tags: assesment test, interview, screening process, test drive, trial

July 7th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
If “test driving” allows the employer to have someone do “real work”, AND be paid, wouldn’t working, even if only for 1 hour, or 1/2 a day, make that person eligible for UI if they turn out to be all talk and no walk?
This scenario seems to be a double edge sword to pay and pay more out of your UI reserve, rather than to implement stronger standards for interview processes. I like the idea of a test or simulation, which our company had already implemented into our standards a long time ago. We recently included having another supervisor, or another department manager meet and interview the interviewee who’s work directly effects their team/department.
July 8th, 2008 at 11:57 am
Our 90 Day Introductory Period pretty much takes care of this problem. In our experience, very few people can “pretend” for three whole months. We usually know BEFORE the end of the period if they are not going to work out. And it could be as little as a week if someone is blatently unqualified.