‘Test driving’ candidates: Pros and cons
June 30, 2008 by Sam NarisiPosted in: Assessing the right candidate, In This Week's E-Newsletter, Interviewing, Latest News & Views
A growing interview trend: giving candidates real work to prove they’re right for the job. Will it help companies find the best talent?
The basic idea is to have the person do part of the position’s duties, either by letting them try for a short time after the interview or paying them to work for a day or two. Interviews often include a test or simulation, but some experts say employers should have candidates do real work before they’re hired.
Here’s why:
- It makes candidates back up the claims they made in the interview.
- It helps candidates make sure they actually want the job.
- You can see how the candidates interact with potential bosses, subordinates and co-workers.
But the method isn’t perfect. The downsides:
- It won’t work for every job. Some positions require on-the-job training or an understanding of the company they can only get after they’ve been hired.
- In many cases, you’d have to ask employees to take a full day or more off from their current jobs.
- It costs money.
- Just like some poor performers get hired because they know how to interview, some people might be impressive during the trial, then flop once they’re hired.
Have you ever tried something like this for assessing candidates? Did it work? Drop us a comment. We’d like to hear what you think.
Tags: assesment test, interview, screening process, test drive, trial

September 12th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
We use the 90 day introductory period. However, getting managers to pay attention, in those first 90 days is sometimes the hard part! Then, 8 months into a job, an employee has a major accident AND an attendance problem??? How did we not notice???
July 10th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
We too have used the 90 day probationary period and have even taken a step before making the critical decision to hire or not. After the interview, we invite the candidate to tour the facility introducing them to managers and line associates. Managers especially have teh opportunity to ask the candidate a wide range of questions and provide an opportunity for non-traditional Q & A. Thus, managers and co-workers have real world input in the hiring process and usually have a range of insights not available during a structured interview. This method seems to work well and has the net result of empowering incumbent staff and giving them a say in hiring their next co-worker.