<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fired fraudster sues over reference check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/</link>
	<description>Headlines and advice for the practicing recruiter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe W</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-7904</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-7904</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t the employee just change file a new W-4 to change his withholding ? Seems like the employee  went to extreme measures, unless there is more to the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t the employee just change file a new W-4 to change his withholding ? Seems like the employee  went to extreme measures, unless there is more to the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6392</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6392</guid>
		<description>When we are asked about references and it involves an employee leaving on less than positive reasons I inform the caller that we recommend they ask the employee for copies of their previous reviews but then go on to only verify name, hire dates, pay and title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we are asked about references and it involves an employee leaving on less than positive reasons I inform the caller that we recommend they ask the employee for copies of their previous reviews but then go on to only verify name, hire dates, pay and title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rittgers, SPHR</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rittgers, SPHR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6387</guid>
		<description>If R.B. is &quot;cautious&quot; I&#039;m ultra cautious.  I don&#039;t give out ANY information without a release (signed or verbal direct from the individual; former or current employee). This includes responding to the question &quot;Does  _____ work there?&quot;  Unless I know that the employee wants me to provide any information, I don&#039;t.  Those seemingly innocent calls asking to verify if someone is an employee can have less-than-innocent purposes.  Employers expect their employees to guard their confidential information.  I believe employees should receive the same consideration.  I don&#039;t feel it is appropriate for me to decide what is and isn&#039;t an employee&#039;s CI.  Once a reference check release is obtained, I&#039;m comfortable providing useful information; knowing that I&#039;m protected by (WI) law that states I&#039;m presumed to be acting in good faith and therefore immune from all civil liability unless a lack of good faith can be shown by clear and convincing evidence that I: 1) knowingly gave false information, 2) made the reference maliciously, 3) violated an employment law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If R.B. is &#8220;cautious&#8221; I&#8217;m ultra cautious.  I don&#8217;t give out ANY information without a release (signed or verbal direct from the individual; former or current employee). This includes responding to the question &#8220;Does  _____ work there?&#8221;  Unless I know that the employee wants me to provide any information, I don&#8217;t.  Those seemingly innocent calls asking to verify if someone is an employee can have less-than-innocent purposes.  Employers expect their employees to guard their confidential information.  I believe employees should receive the same consideration.  I don&#8217;t feel it is appropriate for me to decide what is and isn&#8217;t an employee&#8217;s CI.  Once a reference check release is obtained, I&#8217;m comfortable providing useful information; knowing that I&#8217;m protected by (WI) law that states I&#8217;m presumed to be acting in good faith and therefore immune from all civil liability unless a lack of good faith can be shown by clear and convincing evidence that I: 1) knowingly gave false information, 2) made the reference maliciously, 3) violated an employment law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. B.</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6385</link>
		<dc:creator>R. B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6385</guid>
		<description>I always require the release up front before giving out this kind of information.  All we give without a release is hire date, termination date and title.  Cautious, I know, but it seems wise in today&#039;s lawsuit-happy environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always require the release up front before giving out this kind of information.  All we give without a release is hire date, termination date and title.  Cautious, I know, but it seems wise in today&#8217;s lawsuit-happy environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update March 13, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update March 13, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>[...] Fired fraudster sues over reference check &#124; HRRecruitingAlert.com &#8230; By Sam Narisi Employee Free Choice Act introduced to Congress · Documentation not enough: Mouthy manager lands company in court · Supervisor asked for evidence of harassment — alleged victim sues · Employees on FMLA claim they’re owed more paid sick &#8230; HRRecruitingAlert.com - http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fired fraudster sues over reference check | HRRecruitingAlert.com &#8230; By Sam Narisi Employee Free Choice Act introduced to Congress · Documentation not enough: Mouthy manager lands company in court · Supervisor asked for evidence of harassment — alleged victim sues · Employees on FMLA claim they’re owed more paid sick &#8230; HRRecruitingAlert.com &#8211; <a href="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fired fraudster sues over reference check</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6292</link>
		<dc:creator>Fired fraudster sues over reference check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6292</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full blog here! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full blog here! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-fraudster-sues-over-reference-check/comment-page-1/#comment-6291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=735#comment-6291</guid>
		<description>Sam,

As always great post.  We linked to it and wrote a similar story, check it out:

http://blog.employeescreen.com/2009/03/12/its-alwasy-ok-to-tell-the-truth/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>As always great post.  We linked to it and wrote a similar story, check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.employeescreen.com/2009/03/12/its-alwasy-ok-to-tell-the-truth/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.employeescreen.com/2009/03/12/its-alwasy-ok-to-tell-the-truth/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

