DOL: Watch this legal pitfall in employee furloughs
April 8, 2009 by Sam NarisiPosted in: In This Week's E-Newsletter, Latest News & Views, Law
These days, many employers are putting workers on mandatory furloughs. But they need to be careful when exempt employees are involved.
The Department of Labor (DOL) discussed that issue in a recent Opinion Letter. An employer asked for the DOL’s opinion on this situation:
Because of a drop in business, the company started putting employees on furlough. Workers are first asked to volunteer to take time off. Then, if there aren’t enough volunteers, the company chooses employees on a rotating basis to take mandatory leave.
In both cases, employees are given the option of using accrued PTO. If they don’t have any accrued leave or choose not to use it, the time off is unpaid.
The problem: The mandatory leaves are often shorter than a full week. So the company asked the DOL: Can an employer deduct less than a week’s worth of exempt employees’ salaries when they’re forced to take time off?
No, the DOL responded. Salary deductions can be made when an exempt employee takes a day off for personal reasons. But, according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, “if the employee is ready, willing and able to work,” deductions can’t be made because the employer decides to keep them home.
Employers are also allowed to reduce employees’ weekly hours and change their salaries accordingly. But if hours and pay fluctuate from week to week, the employees will no longer be considered exempt.
Read the entire Opinion Letter here.
Tags: Economy, furloughs, staff reduction

April 10th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Makes sense, as an employer, you can’t have it both ways.
April 10th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
A previous employer had a six week hole in our production schedule and needed to furlough staff. I contacted our state department of labor before we did anything. They walked us though what we could and couldn’t do. For example We could not cut salaried employees work week to fours days and pay them 80%, but we could cut their weekly salary by 20%.
We had a pretty positive response because people kept there jobs. The company avoided laying staff off and incurring unemployment penalties and expense.
The usual troublemakers filed some complaints, but for once, we had DOL on our side.