<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City law makes commuter benefits mandatory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/city-law-makes-commuter-benefits-mandatory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/city-law-makes-commuter-benefits-mandatory/</link>
	<description>Headlines and advice for the practicing recruiter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/city-law-makes-commuter-benefits-mandatory/comment-page-1/#comment-8475</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=241#comment-8475</guid>
		<description>Another government regulation to tax businesses.  It all sounds good until the small buiness lays off a few workers to get below the 20 employees, moves the business out of the city or lays off some workers to cover this tax/fee/mandate.  It doesn&#039;t sound like muc, but mandating by law to have businesses cover these non business expenses is bad policy.  If it is that important to the city offcials and tax payers, why doesn&#039;t the city just make it available on their dime to all these employees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another government regulation to tax businesses.  It all sounds good until the small buiness lays off a few workers to get below the 20 employees, moves the business out of the city or lays off some workers to cover this tax/fee/mandate.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like muc, but mandating by law to have businesses cover these non business expenses is bad policy.  If it is that important to the city offcials and tax payers, why doesn&#8217;t the city just make it available on their dime to all these employees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

