<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRRecruitingAlert.com &#187; In This Week&#8217;s E-Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/category/in-this-weeks-e-newsletter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com</link>
	<description>Headlines and advice for the practicing recruiter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would you tell the boss his fly was down?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/would-you-tell-the-boss-his-fly-was-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/would-you-tell-the-boss-his-fly-was-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awkward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CareerBuilder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The workplace is full of awkward conversations. Which ones are you most reluctant to have? Employees are more comfortable telling co-workers that their zipper is undone than to point out any other embarrassing gaffes, according to a recent CareerBuilder survey. Two-thirds of employees said they&#8217;d tell a peer about an undone fly, while half would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The workplace is full of awkward conversations. Which ones are you most reluctant to have? <span id="more-2439"></span></p>
<p>Employees are more comfortable telling co-workers that their zipper is undone than to point out any other embarrassing gaffes, according to a recent CareerBuilder <a href="http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr526&amp;sd=9%2f24%2f2009&amp;ed=12%2f31%2f2009&amp;siteid=cbpr&amp;sc_cmp1=cb_pr526_" target="_blank">survey</a>. Two-thirds of employees said they&#8217;d tell a peer about an undone fly, while half would do the same to a higher-level co-worker.</p>
<p>Lowest on the comfort scale? Discussing personal hygiene. Just 28% would tell co-workers they needed a shower. The number&#8217;s just 11% when the dirty employee is higher in the ranks.</p>
<p>The rest of the list:</p>
<ol>
<li>You have food in your teeth (66% for a same-level co-worker, 49% for someone higher)</li>
<li>You have something in your nose (51% and 33% )</li>
<li>You have a stain on your clothes (51% and 34%)</li>
<li>Your hair is messy (33% and 13%)</li>
<li>You need a breath mint (33% and 14%)</li>
<li>Your clothes aren&#8217;t appropriate for the workplace (32% and 10%)</li>
</ol>
<p>What conversations are you most uncomfortable having with your peers? How about folks higher up in the company? Let us know in the comments section below.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2439&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/would-you-tell-the-boss-his-fly-was-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 signs a top performer is leaving</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/6-signs-a-top-performer-is-leaving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/6-signs-a-top-performer-is-leaving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departing employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resignations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warning signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resignations often catch managers off-guard &#8212; especially when they involve one of the company&#8217;s best employees. But if supervisors pay attention to the warning signs, they might have a chance to turn things around. Here are the behaviors that could indicate a top performer has one foot out the door: Change in attitude &#8211; For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resignations often catch managers off-guard &#8212; especially when they involve one of the company&#8217;s best employees. But if supervisors pay attention to the warning signs, they might have a chance to turn things around. <span id="more-2457"></span></p>
<p>Here are the behaviors that could indicate a top performer has one foot out the door:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Change in attitude </strong>&#8211; For example, a top team player might withdraw and stop helping others.</li>
<li><strong>Sloppiness </strong>&#8211; Formerly top-notch employees will make more errors when they know they&#8217;re leaving.</li>
<li><strong>Solitude </strong>&#8211; The employee might start to distance himself from others, for example, by eating lunch alone.</li>
<li><strong>More absences </strong>&#8211; Workers headed for the door will take &#8220;sick days&#8221; to attend interviews.</li>
<li><strong>Formal attire </strong>&#8211; Employees will also use lunch to go to interviews, which normally will require them to dress nicer than usual.</li>
<li><strong>Increased Web use </strong>&#8211; Departing workers are less inclined to do actual work, and they&#8217;ll spend a lot of time on online job boards.</li>
</ol>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2457&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/6-signs-a-top-performer-is-leaving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employees fired for legally prescribed drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/employees-fired-for-legally-prescribed-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/employees-fired-for-legally-prescribed-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many companies give new hires mandatory drug tests &#8212; it&#8217;s a smart way to maintain a safe workplace. Just watch what types of drugs you&#8217;re testing for. That&#8217;s the lesson sure to be learned by a Tennessee auto parts supplier that&#8217;s currently fighting two disability discrimination lawsuits. In the most recent case, brought by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many companies give new hires mandatory drug tests &#8212; it&#8217;s a smart way to maintain a safe workplace. Just watch what types of drugs you&#8217;re testing for. <span id="more-2379"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the lesson sure to be learned by a Tennessee auto parts supplier that&#8217;s currently fighting two disability discrimination lawsuits.</p>
<p>In the most recent case, brought by the EEOC, the agency is arguing the company tested for legal prescription drugs such as painkillers. According to the suit, the company fired or refused to hire people with &#8220;disabilities&#8221; (their prescriptions) and failed to keep information learned from the tests confidential, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).</p>
<p>A previous suit was filed on behalf of seven employees by one worker who suffered from chronic back pain, depression and bipolar disorder, was fired after testing positive for &#8220;certain chemicals&#8221; (her prescription drugs).</p>
<p>She&#8217;d never been cited for safety violations, and, she&#8217;s arguing, the medicine didn&#8217;t affect her ability to work.</p>
<p>Courts will normally let companies use prescription medication as a reason not to hire someone only when there&#8217;s a reasonable belief it&#8217;ll affect the candidate&#8217;s work or cause a safety risk.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what the judge says this time.</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>EEOC v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. </em>and <em>Bates v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.</em></p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2379&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/employees-fired-for-legally-prescribed-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-9 &#8216;no-match&#8217; rules pushed aside in favor of E-Verify</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-9-no-match-rules-pushed-aside-in-favor-of-e-verify/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-9-no-match-rules-pushed-aside-in-favor-of-e-verify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Department of Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversial rules regarding new hires&#8217; I-9 forms have been scrapped by the feds, who will instead focus on widening the use of E-Verify. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the so-called &#8216;no-match&#8217; rules (which told employers what to do if the Social Security number provided by a new hire didn&#8217;t match the number in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controversial rules regarding new hires&#8217; I-9 forms have been scrapped by the feds, who will instead focus on widening the use of E-Verify. <span id="more-2479"></span></p>
<p>The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the so-called &#8216;no-match&#8217; rules (which told employers what to do if the Social Security number provided by a new hire didn&#8217;t match the number in the feds&#8217; database) in 2007. Controversy and legal battles have prevented the rule from ever going into effect.</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s officially off the books. A regulation was published in the Federal Register on October 7 rescinding the rule.</p>
<p>The DHS announced it will focus on promoting the use of E-Verify as the mechanism for preventing the employment of illegal immigrants.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2479&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-9-no-match-rules-pushed-aside-in-favor-of-e-verify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 ways firms are preparing for swine flu</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/3-ways-firms-are-preparing-for-swine-flu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/3-ways-firms-are-preparing-for-swine-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time off]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s swine flu season, and many companies are facing a great challenge: allowing people time off to prevent disease from spreading &#8212; without putting too big a dent in productivity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend employees with swine flu stay home for seven days or until they&#8217;ve been symptom-free for 24 hours, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s swine flu season, and many companies are facing a great challenge: allowing people time off to prevent disease from spreading &#8212; without putting too big a dent in productivity. <span id="more-2376"></span></p>
<p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend employees with swine flu stay home for seven days or until they&#8217;ve been symptom-free for 24 hours, whichever&#8217;s longer, according to a recent <em>Chicago Tribune </em><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sun-swine-work-0927-sep27,0,4917644.story?page=2" target="_blank">article</a>.</p>
<p>Seven or more days is a long absence, especially in this economy. Many managers will probably be reluctant to allow that much time off. But they need to understand how low productivity could drop if the flu spreads to several workers.</p>
<p>Some of the ways the <em>Tribune </em>reports companies are dealing with the issue:</p>
<ol>
<li>Financial company CME Group, Inc., has beefed up its telecommuting capacity so more employees can work from home if necessary.</li>
<li>In addition to offering seasonal flu shots and adding hand sanitizer dispensers in its offices, Kraft<strong> </strong>developed a special emergency response plan that includes options such as bringing employees from other areas to plants hard hit by absenteeism.</li>
<li>Ravinia Plumbing and Heating, a company of fewer than 40 employees, has cross-trained workers so operations won&#8217;t be disrupted if some folks are absent.</li>
</ol>
<p>Has your company taken any steps to deal with the anticipated swine flu outbreak? Let us know in the comments section below.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2376&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/3-ways-firms-are-preparing-for-swine-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Working less means working better</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/study-working-less-means-working-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/study-working-less-means-working-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Business Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time off]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managers often pay lip service to the concept of employee burnout without taking proper steps to keep it from happening to their employees. Here&#8217;s some data that could get them to change that. A four-year study, recently published in the Harvard Business Review, looked at what would happen to employees when they were required to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managers often pay lip service to the concept of employee burnout without taking proper steps to keep it from happening to their employees. Here&#8217;s some data that could get them to change that. <span id="more-2367"></span></p>
<p>A four-year study, recently published in the <a href="http://hbr.harvardbusiness.org/2009/10/making-time-off-predictable--required/ar/1" target="_blank"><em>Harvard Business Review</em></a>, looked at what would happen to employees when they were required to take vacation time.</p>
<p>Employees of 12 consulting teams at the Boston Consulting Group were forced to take scheduled time off each week, ranging from a full day of vacation to not working after 6 p.m. one night a week (the consultants frequently work long hours after they get home).</p>
<p>The results: The benefits of mandatory time off went beyond the obvious prevention of burnout. Employees said they came to back to work refreshed after a short break and were more productive. But, perhaps more importantly, teams said the required time off forced them to come up with ways to work more efficiently, and now their work gets done more quickly.</p>
<p>Few companies are likely to actually require employees to take vacation time. But as the study shows, managers might want to avoid giving employees the impression they should never take time off.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2367&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/study-working-less-means-working-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does HR feel about online education?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/how-does-hr-feel-about-online-degrees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/how-does-hr-feel-about-online-degrees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assessing the right candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You find a candidate with the education and experience you need. Does it matter if the person got a degree online? It&#8217;s not as big a deal as it used to be, according to a recent Society for Human Resources Management survey. Nearly all (90%) of HR managers say online degrees are viewed more favorably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You find a candidate with the education and experience you need. Does it matter if the person got a degree online? <span id="more-2372"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as big a deal as it used to be, according to a recent Society for Human Resources Management survey. Nearly all (90%) of HR managers say online degrees are viewed more favorably than they were five years ago. And individual courses taken online are as credible as traditional courses, according to 68% of HR managers.</p>
<p>Still, more often than not, companies would rather hire someone who went to a traditional college: 63% said, everything else being equal, their organization would hire someone who went to a traditional college over someone with an online degree.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your company&#8217;s take on applicants with online degrees? Does it make a difference to you? Let us know your opinion in the comments section below.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2372&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/how-does-hr-feel-about-online-degrees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spanish judge: Cursing at boss can&#8217;t get you fired</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/spanish-judge-cursing-at-boss-cant-get-you-fired/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/spanish-judge-cursing-at-boss-cant-get-you-fired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at-will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurling profanities at a manager would seem like a good reason to get fired. But not in Spain, apparently. During a pay dispute, an employee in Gerona, Spain, called his boss a &#8220;son of a bitch.&#8221; He then called the manager &#8220;crazy&#8221; as he stormed out of the office. Think someone in your company could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurling profanities at a manager would seem like a good reason to get fired. But not in Spain, apparently. <span id="more-2312"></span></p>
<p>During a pay dispute, an employee in Gerona, Spain, called his boss a &#8220;son of a bitch.&#8221; He then called the manager &#8220;crazy&#8221; as he stormed out of the office.</p>
<p>Think someone in your company could do that without getting fired? This manager didn&#8217;t think so either.</p>
<p>But a judge thought differently. The employee sued for wrongful termination (like many European countries, Spain doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;at-will&#8221; employment) and won.</p>
<p>Said the judge: &#8220;The social degradation of language has caused the expressions used by the plaintiff to be commonly used in many situations, especially arguments,&#8221; the <em>Telegraph </em>reports. Therefore, it wasn&#8217;t a serious enough offense to warrant termination.</p>
<p>The court ordered the company reinstate the employee or pay him the equivalent of $9,500.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2312&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/spanish-judge-cursing-at-boss-cant-get-you-fired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired employee not eligible for FMLA &#8212; sues for retaliation anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-employee-not-eligible-for-fmla-sues-for-retaliation-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-employee-not-eligible-for-fmla-sues-for-retaliation-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ineligible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent court case gives managers a warning about handling employees who are turned down for medical leave: Retaliation charges can be filed by employees even if they aren&#8217;t eligible to take FMLA. Here&#8217;s what happened: An employee told his boss he needed FMLA leave to care for his newborn son, who was in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent court case gives managers a warning about handling employees who are turned down for medical leave: Retaliation charges can be filed by employees even if they aren&#8217;t eligible to take FMLA. <span id="more-1083"></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what happened:</p>
<p>An employee told his boss he needed FMLA leave to care for his newborn son, who was in the hospital. He had worked for the company for less than a year, but would have been employed for 15 months by the time he&#8217;d use the leave.</p>
<p>The boss said he&#8217;d look into it. However, before any decision was made about his FMLA request, the company decided to let him go, citing an inadequate skill set.</p>
<p>The employee sued, claiming he was fired because he requested FMLA leave.</p>
<p>The company tried to have the case thrown out &#8212; the employee wasn&#8217;t eligible for FMLA when he was terminated, so he had no standing to sue.</p>
<p>But the court didn&#8217;t buy it. In addition to people who use FMLA, the law covers employees who &#8220;attempt&#8221; to use it &#8212; including people who ask for FMLA leave but are turned down. Those employees can still make a case for retaliation under the law.</p>
<p>That means managers need to be careful that documentation backs up any action taken against employees who&#8217;ve asked for FMLA leave &#8212; even if those employees weren&#8217;t eligible.</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>Reynolds v. Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair</em></p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1083&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/fired-employee-not-eligible-for-fmla-sues-for-retaliation-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I was selling an alligator&#8217;: 10 dumbest excuses for missing work</title>
		<link>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-was-selling-an-alligator-and-9-other-dumb-excuses-for-missing-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-was-selling-an-alligator-and-9-other-dumb-excuses-for-missing-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In This Week's E-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CareeBuilder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?p=2394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When employees call in sick, do your managers assume they&#8217;re lying? If so, they aren&#8217;t alone. Almost 30% of managers believe more employees are using fake excuses than in previous years, according to a recent survey by CareerBuilder. The suspected reason: stress and burnout caused by the economy. They may be on to something. About [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When employees call in sick, do your managers assume they&#8217;re lying? If so, they aren&#8217;t alone. <span id="more-2394"></span></p>
<p>Almost 30% of managers believe more employees are using fake excuses than in previous years, according to a recent survey by CareerBuilder. The suspected reason: stress and burnout caused by the economy.</p>
<p>They may be on to something. About 32% of employees admitted to playing hooky from the office at least once this year. Their top reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>they &#8220;just didn&#8217;t feel like&#8221; going to work (32%)</li>
<li>needed to relax (28%)</li>
<li>wanted to catch up on sleep (16%)</li>
<li>had errands to run (13%)</li>
<li>wanted to miss a meeting (12%), and</li>
<li>used the time to see family and friends (10%).</li>
</ol>
<p>The managers were also asked for the strangest absence excuses they&#8217;ve ever heard. A sample:</p>
<ol>
<li>I woke up in Canada.</li>
<li>I got caught selling an alligator.</li>
<li>My buddies locked me in the trunk of an abandoned car after a weekend of drinking.</li>
<li>My mom said I was not allowed to go to work today.</li>
<li>A bee flew in my mouth.</li>
<li>I accidentally hit a nun with my motorcycle.</li>
<li>A random person threw poison ivy in my face and now I have a rash.</li>
<li>I’m convinced my spouse is having an affair and I’m staying home to catch them.</li>
<li>I was injured chasing a seagull.</li>
<li>I have a headache from eating hot peppers.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Keep skepticism reasonable</strong></p>
<p>Managers clearly have reason for healthy skepticism when employees call in sick &#8212; but, especially during flu season, they need to be careful about the message they send those employees who actually are sick.</p>
<p>The Centers for Disease Control recommends employees with swine flu stay home for at least a week (people who get the virus usually remain contagious for about five to seven days).</p>
<p>Managers need to understand that if they put too much pressure on employees to avoid taking sick days, there&#8217;s a chance they could actually add to the absenteeism problem by inadvertently spreading illness.</p>
<p>The best strategies for making sure sick days are taken only by those who need them? Managers&#8217; favorite strategies: Asking for a doctor&#8217;s note and calling the employee at home.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2394&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrrecruitingalert.com/i-was-selling-an-alligator-and-9-other-dumb-excuses-for-missing-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

