4 common referral mistakes – and how HR can fix them
April 9, 2009 by Sam NarisiPosted in: Attracting talent, Referrals, Special Report

Referrals from current employees are the most common way companies find new hires, according to several surveys. But that doesn’t mean they always provide the most qualified candidates.
Companies trust their referral programs for good reasons — they’re cost effective and generally produce successful employees who stick around. But relying too heavily on referrals can lead to several problems, such as:
- Discrimination charges — When employers over-rely on referrals, the pool of applicants can get very homogeneous, excluding members of some protected classes. In one recent case, Wal-Mart lost a court fight based on allegations that its referral process screened out African-American truck drivers.
- No variety — Beyond just avoiding lawsuits, companies benefit when workers come from different backgrounds and experiences. Current employees are most likely to refer applicants who are just like them — which is not always the best thing.
- Cliques — When referrals are frequently used, companies get big groups of employees who already know each other or have something else in common — for example, they may all have come from the same previous employer or graduated from the same college. That can make it easier for employees to form cliques, which might create friction with other co-workers.
- Flood of low-quality applicants — Of course, employees aren’t always going to make a referral just because they know someone who’s a perfect fit. It could be to do a friend a favor, or for the bonus if one is offered. Problems can arise when managers give referrals too much weight in the decision-making process.
What HR can do
Does that mean employers should eliminate their referral programs? Of course not. But HR should take some steps to make sure referrals are really bringing in the best hires:
- Make sure managers understand this simple rule: Referrals help bring candidates into the applicant pool — they shouldn’t replace interviews and other tools used to pick the best candidate.
- Let employees know their reputations will be affected (positively or negatively) by the candidates they refer. That’ll help them screen their referrals even more closely.
- Don’t treat every job the same — some are easier to find applicants for than others. A targeted approach is better — the reward should be higher when finding a candidate for a tough-to-fill position.
And, of course, referrals should be used in conjunction with other recruiting strategies — not as a replacement.
Does your company use referrals to find new hires? How do you make sure the program is successful? Let us know in the comments section below.
Tags: discrimination, diversity, pitfalls of referral programs

April 28th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
It is well know in my office that our company prefers to hire based on referrals…. fortunately, this method has worked well for the past 25 years of being in business. We have had every kind of relationship here… mother/daughter, father/daughter, sister/brother, husband/wife, friends, roommates, daughter/mother-in-law.
Sometimes, people are completely different at work (i.e. socially easy-going and fun outside of work vs. serious, hard-working and no-nonsense at work). friends for example, could know each other for decades… put them in a working environment and they could very well be strangers in how they relate to business and essentially how they think.
We have a great employee working for us and, a couple of years ago, she got her friend a job here. There had been no problems between the two, until she was promoted into a management roll. In no way, did they work together, they were in separate departments – the friend was so envious and jealous at the fact that she was promoted…. it was very well known in the office and now they both continue to work with us however, they are no longer friends, they do not speak a word to each other….
Is it really worth the risk of loosing a good employee? allowing them to make a decision that could make them uncomfortable to work here in the future? I believe most employees, when there is an open position, tend to look out for people they know, whom they can help… they really don’t realize the potential consequences to their kindness until much later… when it could very well be too late… when it means working with someone who was a really good friend and now, not so much…
Now this situation can also work in the reverse… the friend could have been promoted instead of the person who brought the friend in… then what? What a bout nepotism? I suppose we could go on and on… no one will really get the full affect until they get burned…
April 28th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
please excuse the type-o’s… late for lunch!!